Forum Post: RE: How to remove readonly access for ALG files in Power Rail Track
Naveen A couple of things you could check Option 1 - In Windows Explorer - find the ALG file and right click - properties. Make sure this is not set to read only. Option 2 - In PRT. Go to the geometry...
View ArticleForum Post: Bentley Power Rail Track Crashes
Hello, my Bentley power rail track is crashing. Initially i thought that the design file is too big. But this is not the reason for the crash because my computer's utilization under resource manager is...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Bentley Power Rail Track Crashes
Any possibility that you are running in demo mode 15' ?
View ArticleForum Post: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
Dear All, When I'm trying to display the chainage/Station(Geometry>View geometry>Stationing) in Plan(by using Event Points) I'm specifying the angle to 90 deg. but it's not coming exactly 90 deg...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
It is accurate on my SS4 version: 90.0000° I don't see any reason why it is not on yours. Did you type 90.000^ in the angle field?
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
Mine is also SS4(V8i) Yeah 90.000^ is the vaule which I have specified(you can find same in the image which I have attached along with the question) Its happening in my colleagues system also.
View ArticleForum Post: Validating regression data (rail coordinates) before creating...
Hi, I asked the following question last year for ORD EAP. I am re-posting it to see if there has been any update. cheers, Okan Is there a method to do a check on the coordinates of the regression...
View ArticleForum Post: Really disappointed from ORD
I tried to use the new product of Bentley rail called “open rail designer”, I ‘m really disappointed from this product, I can’t understand this huge step back from Bentley developers. They had an...
View ArticleForum Post: SIG Virtual Workshop: OpenRail - March 27, 2019 - You're Invited!
OpenRail Special Interest Group Virtual Workshop Topic Update: OpenRail: From Planning to Performance Presenter: Robert Henderson, Rail & Transit Consultant, Bentley Systems, Inc. March 27, 2019 –...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
Sorry for the delay in reply Please find the attached DGN and XIN file for your reference communities.bentley.com/.../DGN.dgn communities.bentley.com/.../XIN.xin
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Really disappointed from ORD
Zaher See the link below: Open Rail Designer - Freezes
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Really disappointed from ORD
Thank you Neville for this link, but I'm not ok with the tiltle of post :) . it's not about freezing, it's about evrey thing.. maybe the "developpers" start to understand us...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Really disappointed from ORD
Zaher Please refer to my posting of 4 March where I share your concerns.
View ArticleForum Post: Secondary alignment not perpendicular and a different size?
Hi, How to get this template perpendicular to the alignment? Now it seems the size of the left sleeper is different than the right sleeper. Does anyone tested this? It seems useless to create a double...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Open Rail Designer - Freezes
Hi JPLN, I'm not agreed with you, i don't think there is only one user prefer this "arrangement". you don't know how much we are disapointed from this product (ORD). this product is a disaster. you...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
Everything looks fine. But none of your preference is using 90.000^ but 270.000^ So is it the same XIN ? Be sure to type again in the filed and save the preference to eliminate any doubt concerning the...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Open Rail Designer - Freezes
I won't debate too much between SS2/OpenRail. My point of view is not because I am Bentley but because I have demonstrated/trained people for more than 10 years now on Rail track SS2 and before on MX...
View ArticleForum Post: RE: Leader Line at a speicifed angle in Plan
I'm using 270.000^ but that is opposite of 90.000^(i.e the annotation will come on right side instead of left side), if I'm using 270.000^ or 90.000^ in straight location also its not coming as...
View Article